Love Mom, Not Wal-Mart

The Wake Up Wal-Mart campaign is taking the opportunity this Mother’s Day to highlight Wal-Mart’s discrimination against women in their employ. Of course, I should have posted this story weeks ago, but who ever does anything early for Mother’s Day?

Visit the site, sign a pledge that you will not buy any Mother’s Day gifts at Wal-Mart while they discriminate against all the moms who work for them, forward to everyone you know and then buy your mom some flowers.

I’m not buying any gifts. I’m cooking my mom a nice dinner. Crab-stuffed mushrooms and calamari in a red wine sauce (I may post that recipe later).

Once again, I’m organizing a few people to help the Wal-Mart Free NYC Coalition leaflet at the Staten Island ferry during rush hour on Thursday. Let me know if you can join us. The Wal-Mart Free people will be leafletting during rush hour every Tuesday in May, on the Manhattan side of the SI ferry, and every Thursday in May on the SI side, so try to help out at least once.

Black Tuesday

I need to remind myself that I am not a professional journalist. I am, help me, a “blogger” with no cover and no paycheck. I need to write for an imagined audience that includes all my friends, comrades, neighbors, family and girlfriends (past, present and future) as well as all of my employers, past and prospective.

I’d like to offer all of my opinions on Tuesday’s “restructuring” of the AFL-CIO that closed and merge departments and laid-off a third of the federation’s staff, but I’d like even more to work in the labor movement again. So, I’m just going to offer a few links. Jonathan Tasini has a lot of inside information of how the news went down at 16th Street. American Prospect has a good piece by Harold Myerson on the politics of the cuts. And, as always, the Unite To Win blog has all those anonymous staffers slugging it out.

I’ve been looking for work for six months, and now I’m going to be joined by 167 experienced union staffers, while the whole movement seems to hold its breath, waiting for the outcome of the federation’s convention in July.

It’s very frustrating. All I want is to be a part of a growing, fighting union. I want to take on Wal-Mart. I want to take on Bloomberg and Pataki. I want to take on Sodexho, Aramark and Cintas. I want to get off of the dole, already!

Speaking of Wal-Mart, I’m organizing a few people to help the Wal-Mart Free NYC Coalition leaflet at the Staten Island ferry during rush hour on Thursday. Let me know if you can join us.

Finally, for your amusement, a picture of the YPSL contingent at Sunday’s No Nuke rally.

Five and a Half Dollar Movie Round-up

“Palindromes” is unremittingly bleak and cynical. Todd Solondz’ latest begins with the funeral of Dawn Weiner, the heroine of his earlier, funnier “Welcome to the Dollhouse.” The alluded-to date rape and suicide of his beloved character signals the film’s non-stop assault on hopefulness. His next victim is a cousin of Dawn’s, 13-year-old Aviva, who wants nothing more than to have “lots and lots of babies.” That innocent desire takes her from dispassionate, cringe-inducing underage sex to a botched abortion (at her liberal mother’s insistence) to hitchhiking and even more cringe-worthy sex with a trucker. From there, Aviva finds herself in the care of Mama Sunshine, a kind and mostly harmless christian who cares for a dozen or so disabled children who live and laugh together and sing and dance boy-band style peans to Jesus and the unborn children, while local yahoos in the basement plan the assassination of an abortion provider (Aviva’s, as luck would have it). And, yes, we see the attack on the doctor’s home, while he plays charades with his children.

Aviva is portrayed by multiple actresses, of different shapes, sizes and colors (including, at one point, Jennifer Jason Leigh). Solondz’ art school distraction serves to keep the character at an emotional distance from the audience. It’s less storytelling and more a sadistic little boy pulling the wings off a butterfly. I consider it a perverse accomplishment that out of an audience of half a dozen paying moviegoers, I was the only person in the theater by the time the credits rolled. Everyone else had left, one by one, in a huff as each new assault on Aviva’s innocence and our good taste came on screen.

“The Ballad of Jack and Rose” is immediately likable, opening with the crescendo of Creedence Clearwater Revival’s “I Put A Spell On You” and a long camera pan across an idyllic island commune. The commune is home to Jack, a bombastic Scottish ex-pat played by Daniel Day-Lewis, and his teenage daughter Rose (the very lovely Camilla Belle). It is Rose who is under a spell, hopelessly devoted to her dying father, who has raised and home-schooled her alone ever since the rest of the 60’s society drop-outs who formed the commune – including the unseen mother and wife of the titular duo – left the island to rejoin normal society.

The outside world comes crashing in when Jack invites his girlfriend and her two teenage sons to live with him on the island. “She’s so normal,” hisses an emotionally betrayed Rose, who sets off to lose her virginity and chase the girlfriend from their home.

The 1980’s also come crashing in, as a developer begins building suburban houses over some wetlands on the other side of the island. Beau Bridges plays the developer as a rather likable, nice guy whose response to Jack’s violent and destructive tactics to ward off the development is a living room chat over tea. He is not the villain of the movie. Rather, he is yet another foil for Jack to come to terms with his crisis of conscience over his choices in life and his parenting of Rose.

The film’s climax is tense and unpredictable, but it’s unfortunately ruined by an utterly tacked-on thirty second epilogue. “Oldboy” shares the same dark secret as “Jack and Rose” (Hint: It’s not child molestation, genocide, abortion or assisted suicide, but I’m thinking of adding it to that list). Its ending likewise disappoints.

A stylish, fast-paced and frenetic Korean import, “Oldboy” begins with an unremarkable office worker’s night of public drunkenness and disorderly conduct, and his subsequent abduction and imprisonment. Finding himself in a windowless hotel room with a television as his only connection to the outside world, Dae-su Oh learns that his wife has been murdered and he is the main “person of interest”. He spends the next 15 years teaching himself to fight by watching action movies and boxing matches on the teevee, while plotting his escape and revenge.

When he is just-as-mysteriously let go, Dae-su Oh sets out to find out who imprisoned him, and why, and to get his revenge. At this point, the movie promises to be a slick and amusing revenge flick, akin to “Kill Bill,” with our stoic hero and his quickly acquired nubile sidekick kicking ass and taking names. Indeed, the first half of the movie is a rapid succession of delightful and inventive fights, investigations and fish-out-of-water interactions. But when the “who” of our mystery is revealed too quickly, the “why” and the motivation become increasingly bizarre and the movie runs out of steam.

A Socialist In the Senate?

Come 2006, the state of Vermont may be represented by an independent socialist in the U.S. Senate. Jim Jeffords, the former Republican Senator who went independent in protest of the Bush agenda, announced last month that he will not seek re-election. Bernie Sanders, Vermont’s sole representative in the House and an independent as well, quickly announced his intention to run for Jeffords’ seat.

Sanders has long served in public office as an independent, beginning with a five year stint as Mayor of Burlington in the 1980’s and culminating in the last fifteen years in the US House of Representatives. He has also spearheaded the birth of a competitive statewide third party in Vermont, the Progressive Party and founded the US House Progressive Caucus.

Sanders doesn’t shy away from the “s” word, either. He spoke at the Democratic Socialists of America convention in 1999, and I have, somewhere, pictures of him speaking at the 1983 Socialist Party convention.

Which is not to say that Sanders gets full bona fides on the left. His “independence” has long had a nudge-and-wink relationship with the Democrats, with whom he caucuses in the House, and who have not mounted a serious challenge against his candidacy for at least ten years. In fact, the Democrats are unlikely to field a serious candidate against Bernie’s Senate campaign either.

There’s also Bernie’s disappointing hedging on some military engagements.

But, then, he has an across-the-board 100% voting score on labor issues, women’s issues and a litany of progressive causes, and he takes every opportunity he can to give Alan Greenspan agita.

His is a voice that would serve us well to be amplified in that most exclusive club, the US Senate. Considering the fact that the Democrats won’t contest the seat, the Republicans do not have a marquee name to run and Sanders already gets elected by huge majorities of all of Vermont’s voters every two years, he looks to be a shoo-in.

Keep an eye on this one. Bernie has a tremendous potential to be a rallying point for progressive and independent politics. He also has more rope to hang himself. I prefer to give him qualified support now and hope for the best, than to denounce him and expect the worst. I urge you to do the same.