Gene Russianoff, the grand poobah of the New York Public Interest Research Group and the Straphangers Campaign, is oft-quoted in the city’s media, and usually reliable for sensible good government critique. But Gene, apparently, doesn’t have a clue how unions work.
Responding in the Times to a City Council bill that recognizes that local unions are distinct political entities with their own agendas that are distinct from the larger federations to which they belong, Gene says, “It will allow the same decision-maker to make multiple contributions.”
I guess Gene’s opinion is skewed by how NYPIRG operates, where from Albany to Queens College to Stony Brook, the chapters carry the same message and work on the same campaigns: those that Gene decides. But in labor, while unity is the goal, the locals have their own goals and loyalties. For example, in SEIU, Local 1199 (health care workers) endorsed Freddy Ferrer while Local 32BJ endorsed Bloomberg. Obviously, SEIU President Andy Stern wasn’t “calling the shots” here.
The situation becomes even more complicated with mergers. The garment workers local 23-25 of UNITE HERE simply does not have the same political agenda as the hotel workers local 6 of UNITE HERE. The garment workers lobby to preserve special zoning for factories in the garment district. Without that special zoning, hotels would pop up in that valuable midtown district.
But the Campaign Finance Board, in interpreting the city’s campaign finance law, decided to consider all locals of the same international union one political entity and to cap their donations severely. The decision was an insult to labor and a threat to the integrity of the campaign finance law itself. Gene should do some more research.